bovinetb.co.uk Report : Visit Site

Technical data of the bovinetb.co.uk

Geo IP provides you such as latitude, longitude and ISP (Internet Service Provider) etc. informations. Our GeoIP service found where is host bovinetb.co.uk. Currently, hosted in United Kingdom and its service provider is Krystal Solutions LLP .

the related websites

bovinetb.info nfuonline.com somersetwildlife.org hanlonblog.dailymail.co.uk alpacatb.com www2.warwick.ac.uk cepr.net greenpeace.org admiral.com oaic.gov.au insurance4carhire.com swiftcover.com jrf.org.uk supanet.com iiss.org eu.blizzard.com 

HTTP Header Analysis

HTTP Header information is a part of HTTP protocol that a user's browser sends to called LiteSpeed containing the details of what the browser wants and will accept back from the web server.

DNS

HtmlToText

home fundamentals case studies & articles forum registration about us links faq's help support full site search user login username password forgot your password? rethink btb read and comment on the discussion document by the new rethinkbtb group human parallels we are interested in learning more about the parallels that may be drawn to the human form of tb (bearing in mind that the bovine form accounts for less than 0.5% of human tb cases in the uk) as this may indicate the true risks of bovine tb which may be far less than the current policy implies. humans are tested using one of the existing skin tests (eg the heaf or mantoux test) which is very similar to the skin test used for cattle. up until a few years ago there was a regular testing and vaccination programme for teenagers but this is no longer done routinely, although testing is still available privately and for high-risk people. it must be noted that all skin tests are only capable of attempting to determine whether or not there has been any exposure to the mycobacteria that cause tb. as with the cattle test, in humans tuberculin is injected into the skin and the results are read 48 - 72 hours later, by measuring any indurations. if there is no swelling or it is under a certain depth the person is vaccinated. over the stipulated measurement and the person is classed as a reactor and not vaccinated. if there are any clinical symptoms (very rare) further medical investigation and treatment, if applicable, is initiated. interestingly, human cases 'reactors' are not culled as cattle are and these people continue to live among us as there is presumably so little risk of them spreading tb. very few go on to develop the disease. so one would assume the same would apply to cattle? however, with cattle all reactors are assumed to be infected or potentially infectious, so are slaughtered 'just in case'. most cattle that are declared reactors by the skin test are likely to have remained healthy if they were not prematurely culled to comply with the existing test and cull policy. they are culled as a precaution. we need to justify why we kill so many cattle just because they are deemed to be 'reactors'? most milk is pasteurised and meat is cooked - heat destroys any mycobacteria, so risk to human health is very minimal. for more information on this subject see http://www.bovinetb.co.uk/article.php?article_id=106. it does seem we are using a sledgehammer to crack a nut with the policy that has become increasingly rigid and increasingly fails. it seems clear to me that the existing regime has got to a point where the policy is worse than the disease itself. introducing team badger we are getting an increasing number of farmers who are becoming more and more concerned regarding the proposals to cull badgers. they are concerned regarding the growing public opposition and lack of crediblescientificevidence. whilst the badger continues to be the main focus of attention it distracts from a proper, sustainable way forward for farmers, based on cattle vaccination. the growing number of groups that are opposing the badger cull are now calling for cattle vaccination. team badger is a coalition of these groups. team badger they have also set up a new website to encourage the vaccination of cattle and badgers against bovine tb. funding is available to help with the latter. the badger and cattle vaccination initiative the government e-petition , 'stop the badger cull', exceeded 304,157 signatures - this petition has received the highest number of signatures of any government petition. it is now closed but a new e-petition was started up soon after and already has almost 7,000 signatures. another petition is the 38 degrees petition , 'rethink the badger cull' which is heading towards 100,000. faq latest is mycobacterium bovis really a significant health risk for humans? 27 aug 2018, 5:44 am campaigning for the right to vaccinate cattle against tb bovine tb is a very low health risk the food standards agency says 'there had not been a single documented case of someone developing human tb after eating infected meat.' in fact, so low is the risk that they go on to say 'where a carcass shows evidence of localised tb, the lesions are cut out and the rest of the carcass is passed as fit for human consumption.' july 2009 fundamentals latest is the costly and controversial existing btb policy really about protecting human health and, if not, is there an alternative way forward? 20 mar 2010, 6:59 pm is the costly and controversial existing btb policy really about protecting human health and, if not, is there an alternative way forward? these are the main questions that politicians and those involved with policy making should be asking, particularly in this current era of financial crisis as public expenditure in the uk on btb control continues to escalate read more... faq top viewed 1. can bovine tb spread to humans? 2. is the badger a scapegoat? 3. is mycobacterium bovis really a significant health risk for humans? 4. can the ever-increasing costs of the bovine tb programme be justified? 5. how safe is meat with the 'so-called' increased incidences of tb? is the existing bovine tb eradication policy really working? is the existing costly and disruptive programme that aims to eradicate btb in the uk good value for money and is it really working? no. is the existing policy now having more of an adverse impact on human and cattle welfare than the risks from the disease it is aiming to control/eradicate? yes. over the last few years there have been at least two human deaths - not from bovine tb but as a result of the skin test. in april 2010 an irish farmer died and in january 2013 a carmarthenshire farmer died. many farmers and vets are injured during the testing process. cattle too are frequently injured or killed. would it be more sensible instead to have a control policy, rather than one that aims for the impossible - eradication? yes since the 1950's, when the testing of cattle for bovine tb (btb) in the uk became compulsory following its initial introduction on a voluntary basis in the 1930's, many millions of pounds have been spent on trying to eradicate the disease using an imperfect skin test. however, despite some 60 years of testing and all this expenditure, and many thousands of slaughtered cattle, little progress has been made, and the financial costs continue to escalate year on year. perhaps more importantly, the government has done little to determine the true costs of the existing testing policy; the consequences of the enormous pressures on cattle and alpaca owners; business failures as a result of herd breakdowns, health and safety risks from cattle handling and the actual consequences of culling indigenous wildlife species ... the existing policy is a bureaucratic nightmare. it is starting too to involve an even greater number of people and animals as legislation is being brought in to test/cull wildlife and other domestic animals. what is clear is that after 60 years of using the same old test (which is not reliable enough to be anything other than a herd test), culling thousands of cattle, and millions of pounds of public expenditure spent on compensation payments, research etc, the existing eradication (elimination!) policy is impossible to achieve and sustain whilst the bacteria that causes bovine tb is so endemic around the world and globalisation continues to increase. as this website clearly reveals, the current insistence on striving for eradication is undoubtedly causing more suffering to farmers and their animals than the risks of the actual disease itself. the government persistently fails to adequately justify the need for such an expensive and draconian policy, either on the grounds of human or animal health or even on economic grounds. as the skin test is not used as a herd test in the uk it will be impossible to eradicate the disease and we should be learning, instead, to live with it. c

URL analysis for bovinetb.co.uk

http://www.bovinetb.co.uk/user_profile.php
http://www.bovinetb.co.uk/forgot_password.php
http://www.bovinetb.co.uk/page.php?page=about
http://www.bovinetb.co.uk/article.php?article_id=10
http://www.bovinetb.co.uk/article.php?article_id=41
http://www.bovinetb.co.uk/articles.php?category_id=3
http://www.bovinetb.co.uk/articles.php?category_id=1
http://www.bovinetb.co.uk/article.php?article_id=39
http://www.bovinetb.co.uk/page.php?page=site_map
http://www.bovinetb.co.uk/articles.php?category_id=4
http://www.bovinetb.co.uk/articles.php?category_id=32
http://www.bovinetb.co.uk/article.php?article_id=4
http://www.bovinetb.co.uk/article.php?article_id=19
http://www.bovinetb.co.uk/forums.php
http://www.bovinetb.co.uk/article.php?article_id=23
boxstersstory.co.uk
epetitions.direct.gov.uk
38degrees.org.uk
bacvi.co.uk
news.bbc.co.uk

Whois Information

Whois is a protocol that is access to registering information. You can reach when the website was registered, when it will be expire, what is contact details of the site with the following informations. In a nutshell, it includes these informations;

Error for "bovinetb.co.uk".

the WHOIS query quota for 2600:3c03:0000:0000:f03c:91ff:feae:779d has been exceeded
and will be replenished in 11 seconds

WHOIS lookup made at 23:47:16 23-Jul-2017

--
This WHOIS information is provided for free by Nominet UK the central registry
for .uk domain names. This information and the .uk WHOIS are:

Copyright Nominet UK 1996 - 2017.

You may not access the .uk WHOIS or use any data from it except as permitted
by the terms of use available in full at http://www.nominet.uk/whoisterms,
which includes restrictions on: (A) use of the data for advertising, or its
repackaging, recompilation, redistribution or reuse (B) obscuring, removing
or hiding any or all of this notice and (C) exceeding query rate or volume
limits. The data is provided on an 'as-is' basis and may lag behind the
register. Access may be withdrawn or restricted at any time.

  REFERRER http://www.nominet.org.uk

  REGISTRAR Nominet UK

SERVERS

  SERVER co.uk.whois-servers.net

  ARGS bovinetb.co.uk

  PORT 43

  TYPE domain

DISCLAIMER
This WHOIS information is provided for free by Nominet UK the central registry
for .uk domain names. This information and the .uk WHOIS are:
Copyright Nominet UK 1996 - 2017.
You may not access the .uk WHOIS or use any data from it except as permitted
by the terms of use available in full at http://www.nominet.uk/whoisterms,
which includes restrictions on: (A) use of the data for advertising, or its
repackaging, recompilation, redistribution or reuse (B) obscuring, removing
or hiding any or all of this notice and (C) exceeding query rate or volume
limits. The data is provided on an 'as-is' basis and may lag behind the
register. Access may be withdrawn or restricted at any time.

  REGISTERED no

DOMAIN

  NAME bovinetb.co.uk

NSERVER

  NS1.UKSRV.CO.UK 77.72.0.11

  NS2.UKSRV.CO.UK 139.162.230.184

Mistakes

The following list shows you to spelling mistakes possible of the internet users for the website searched .